In what circumstance could an attorney be disciplined for their conduct regarding a case?

An attorney could be disciplined for their conduct regarding a case if they neglect to inform a legal governing body of misconduct. This obligation exists because attorneys are often required to report unethical behavior or violations of professional conduct, not just their own but also that of their peers. Failing to report such misconduct undermines the integrity of the legal profession and can lead to disciplinary action against the attorney who fails to fulfill this duty.

In this context, being aware of misconduct and not reporting it can be seen as complicity or a failure to uphold the ethical standards of the profession. This responsibility is enacted to ensure accountability and maintain trust in the legal system, making it imperative for attorneys to act on such knowledge.

The other options do not constitute grounds for discipline in the same way. Frequent changes in law areas, while potentially problematic for an attorney's competence in a specific field, are not in themselves disciplinary issues. Keeping clients constantly updated is actually a best practice and a sign of good client communication, not a basis for discipline. Having too many clients could lead to issues such as conflicts of interest or inability to provide adequate representation, but in itself does not automatically warrant disciplinary action unless it affects the quality of service or leads to misconduct.